Deciding Khula Pakistan Family Law:
If you wish to decide your family dispute of khula Pakistan family law for Nadra divorce certificate you may contact Jamila Law Associates. The defendant-husband dissolved the marriage on the phone. The wife was bound to return half of the dowered ornaments to the husband in the present case through khula Pakistan family law for Nadra divorce certificate.
Appellate Court:
The Appellate Court rightly modified the judgment of the Family Court. The constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. Petitioner challenged the validity of S. 10(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1964, and implead the Parliament. Government through Secretary concerned was relevant in some legislation was in question. Vires of legislation could be subject to judicial review by Superior Courts, but such power was subject to jurisdiction as conferred by the Constitution. In the present case, the Petitioner had questioned S. 10(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1964, alleging the same to be contrary to the Injunctions of Islam.
Petitioner:
Petitioner missed relevant provisions of the Constitution, which specifically placed the bar on the jurisdiction of the High Court in such a matter of khula Pakistan family law for Nadra divorce certificate. Article 203G of the Constitution placed a bar on the jurisdiction of any court, including Supreme Court or High Court, to entertain any proceedings or exercise any power or jurisdiction regarding any matter lying within the power of jurisdiction of the Federal Shariat Court. Article203D of the Constitution dealt with the powers and jurisdiction of khula Pakistan family law for Nadra divorce certificate vested with the Federal Shariat Court.
Nadra Divorce Certificate:
Regarding the khula Pakistan family law for Nadra divorce certificate it included the power to examine and decide whether or not any law or provision of the law was repugnant to Injunctions of Islam or Holy Quran or sunned in Art. 203-D of the Constitution. High Court lacked jurisdiction in the matter. Section 10(5). Suit for dissolution of marriage and recovery of dower. Return of dower in case of Khula. Scope. Entry in Nikahnama. Effect. Appreciation of evidence in toot. Scope. Petitioner/ex-husband contended that respondent/ex-wife was not entitled to recovery of dower as in objection and evidence/cross-examination she had not claimed seven Marla’s, house as outstanding dower Validity. The record revealed that the relevant paragraph of the plaint, Nikahnama, and affidavits submitted in evidence mentioned seven Marla’s houses. The document, as well as evidence, had to be read as a whole and not piecemeal.
High Court:
High Court observed that to negate the respondent’s version, Petitioner had failed to record the evidence of witnesses of Nikahnama. It need not prove admitted document and presumption of truth was attached to such document. When the marriage was dissolved based on khula Pakistan family law for Nadra divorce certificate ‘ then the remaining dower became payable and deferred dower, which was the husband’s liability, was to be paid to the wife to the extent of 50% in terms of S.10(5) of Family Courts Act, 1964. High Court under constitutional jurisdiction could not substitute findings of facts nor give the opinion regarding quality or adequacy of khula Pakistan family law for Nadra divorce certificate.
