Family Courts for Child and Wife Maintenance a Month

Courts for Child and Wife Maintenance a Month:
If you wish to file case under child maintenance law in Pakistan or wife maintenance a month, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. The Court of law cannot act whimsically and erratically but is supposed to find out from the evidence on the record as to the minor’s requirement for his subsistence, which meant the support of his life under child maintenance law in Pakistan or wife maintenance a month.
Different Requirement:
Requirements included food, clothing, lodging, education, medical care, some amount for the minor’s extracurricular activities, etc. The Family- Court, while granting maintenance, cannot earmark a sum for his future security. Such part of the judgment is liable to be set aside. The commandment shows that no marriage can occur without fixing the proper Dower, and if it is not set at the time of marriage, the husband must pay it according to his status, as some jurists hold. The dower of “Mohr” is that sum of money or other property. Dower is either prompt or deferred or part prompt and part deferred.
Prompt Dower:
Prompt Dower would be payable on demand, while the deferred Dower is payable on dissolution of marriage by death or divorce. Burden to prove under child maintenance law in Pakistan or wife maintenance a month is on plaintiff. The claim of the wife of Dower that the whole amount of Dower was owed to her on demand, whereas the husband contended that he had paid the total amount and nothing was due. The burden to prove payment on the husband. He is not absolved of his liability to maintain her even though she is not residing with him, provided she has a lawful excuse or a legal right to refuse to live with her husband on account of non-payment of prompt Dower.
Child Maintenance Law:
Regarding the child maintenance law in Pakistan or wife maintenance a month ex-husband claiming that his ex-wife through remission-deed executed by her through a petitioner writer had remitted the payment of Dower which fact denied by the ex-wife. Husband making application for comparison of thumb expression with one allegedly affixed by her on remission deed was in question. Trial Court dismissing the application on the score that the original act has not been brought on record, without realizing that the original deal was in the custody of an ex-wife who denied such charge.
Claim:
The claim of an ex-husband that remission deed was in the control of ex-wife to which he had no record was a sufficient explanation of its non-production in child maintenance law in Pakistan or wife maintenance a month. Refusal to grant application of ex-husband y Trial Court not proper and would tantamount to refuse him a fair and adequate opportunity of hearing causing him serious prejudices.
Nikahnama:
The entries in Nikahnama do not offend the provision of S. 17 of the Registration. Such an act of acknowledgment purportedly executed before the whole family must receive due to faith and not be thrown away simply that it has not gone through registration formality in child maintenance law in Pakistan or wife maintenance a month. The columns Nikahnama indicate that they refer to an arrangement that had already subscribed to parties and record prepared only to verify the events that had already happened.